NSF/SRS Postdoc Data Project: Phase 2

A multi-year project to study postdocs in the US

Home

PDP Background

PDP Rationale

PDP Phases

PDP Methodology

Postdoc Literature

Previous Research

Response Behavior Survey

Phase 1

Phase 2 Overview

Postdoc Definitions

Definitions Background

PDP Definitions Project

Establishment Definitions

Individual Definitions

Definitions Conclusions

Evaluating Lists

List-assessment Process

List-assessment Interview

Approaches

Funding Agency Study

FAS Background

FAS Sampling Strategy

FAS Data Collection

FAS Findings

Postdoc Questionnaire

Questionnaire Background

Questionnaire Methods

Questionnaire Sections

Questionnaire Assumptions

Additional Resources

Acronyms

Papers and Presentations

Postdoc Links

Contact Us

 
PDP Rationale

The National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS) serves as a “central clearinghouse for data . . . on science and engineering resources.” It is federally mandated to act as “a source of information for policy formulation.”

Through ongoing surveys, SRS has noted increases in the:

  • Number of postdocs
  • Duration of postdoc appointments
  • Number of foreign-degreed individuals in postdocs

But it is unclear how these trends impact the US research enterprise, labor force, and science and engineering (S&E) markets.1


Gaps in postdoc coverage
Postdoc data are vital for assessing the US research enterprise. Existing SRS sources focus mainly on postdocs who have received PhD degrees from US institutions and who work in the academic sector. The Postdoc Data Project (PDP) aims to increase the coverage of postdocs with:

  • Foreign degrees
  • PhD-equivalent degrees, such as MDs or DDSs
  • Appointments in non-academic sectors

Gaps in postdoc data
In addition to limited coverage of the postdoc population, there are limited national data about the postdoc experience itself. In recent years, members of the research community have raised concerns about:

  • Decisions to seek, accept, complete or leave an appointment
  • Quality of life issues such as health care access and impact on immediate family
  • Duration of appointments
  • Sources of support including benefits and their impact on duration
  • Determinants of a successful appointment
  • Career and educational aspirations and expectations
  • Formal and informal mentoring relationships

1. Rivers, Emilda. (2006, October 16). Postdoc Data Project: Southern Association of Institutional Research. National Science Foundation.



 
PDP Background

PDP Phases-->

©2006-2009 Postdoc Data Project
Site created and maintained by
Survey Sciences Group, LLC, the NSF/SRS contractor for PDP Phase 2.